ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ МОДЕЛИ В ОБЛАСТИ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ ФИЗИЧЕСКОЙ АКТИВНОСТИ
Ключевые слова:
физическая активность, перспективы применения, физическое здоровье, социально-экологическая модель.
Аннотация
В исследовании по содействию физической активности традиционные исследования переоценивают роль отдельных психологических факторов и относительно игнорируют роль факторов окружающей среды. Социально-экологическая модель, как всеобъемлющая и междисциплинарная структура, предоставляет новые идеи для изучения физической активности. Эта модель всесторонне рассматривает различные уровни влияющих факторов отдельных лиц и окружающей среды: внутри индивидуальный уровень, межличностный уровень, уровень организации, уровень сообщества и уровень политики. В этой статье рассматривается эволюция применения модели в области физической активности и прогресс исследований на различных уровнях, чтобы обеспечить теоретическую справку для будущего применения модели для вмешательства физической активности.
Литература
REFERENCES
1. Baranowski T., Anderson C., Carmack C. Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions: How are we doing? How might we do better? American journal of preventive medicine, 1998, no. 15(4), pp. 266297. (In Engl.).
2. Bertrais S., Preziosi P., et al. Sociodemographic and geographic correlates of meeting current recommendations for physical activity in middle-aged French adults: the Supplementation en Vitamines et Mineraux Antioxydants (SUVIMAX) Study. American Journal of Public Health, 2004, no. 94(9), pp. 1560–1566. (In Engl.).
3. Booth M.L., Bauman A., Owen N., Gore C.J. Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. Preventive medicine, 1997, no. 26(1), pp. 131–137. (In Engl.).
4. Bronfenbrenner U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American psychologist, 1997, no. 32(7), pp. 513–531. (In Engl.).
5. Brownson R.C., Baker E.A., Housemann R.A., Brennan L.K., Bacak S.J. Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. Journal Information, 2001, no. 91 (12), pp. 1995–2003. (In Engl.).
6. De B.I., Sallis J. Relative contribution of psychosocial variables to the explanation of physical activity in three population-based adult samples. Preventive medicine, 2002, no. 34(2), pp. 279–288. (In Engl.).
7. De B.I., Teixeira P.J., Cardon G., Deforche B. Environmental and psychosocial correlates of physical activity in Portuguese and Belgian adults. Public Health Nutrition, 2005, no. 8(7), pp. 886–895. (In Engl.).
8. Dishman R.K., Buckworth J. Increasing physical activity: a quantitative synthesis. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 1996, no. 28(6), pp. 706–719. (In Engl.).
9. Dowda M., Ainsworth B.E., Addy C.L., Saunders R., Riner W. Correlates of physical activity among US young adults, 18 to 30 years of age, from NHANES III. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2003, no. 26(1), pp. 15–23. (In Engl.).
10. Fleury J. and Lee S.M. The social ecological model and physical activity in African American women. American journal of community psychology, 2006, no. 37 (1-2), pp. 129–140. (In Engl.).
11. Grzywacz J.G., Marks N.F. Social inequalities and exercise during adulthood: toward an ecological perspective. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 2001, no. 42(2), pp. 202–220. (In Engl.).
12. Humpel N., Owen N., Leslie E. Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity. American journal of preventive medicine, 2002, no. 22(3), pp. 188–199. (In Engl.).
13. King A.C., Castro C., et al. Personal and environmental factors associated with physical inactivity among different racial–ethnic groups of US middle-aged and older-aged women. Health Psychology, 2000, no. 19(4), pp. 354–364. (In Engl.).
14. Marquez D. X., Mc Auley E. Social cognitive correlates of leisure time physical activity among Latinos. Journal of behavioral medicine, 2006, no. 29(3), pp. 281–289. (In Engl.).
15. Mc Leroy K. R., Bibeau D., Steckler A., Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education & Behavior, 1988, no. 15(4), pp. 351–377. (In Engl.).
16. Mc Millan D.W. and D.M. Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of community psychology, 1986, no. 14(1), pp. 6–23. (In Engl.).
17. Miles L. Physical activity and health. Nutrition Bulletin, 2007, no. 32(4), pp. 314–363. (In Engl.).
18. Morandi L. The role of state policy in promoting physical activity. Preventive medicine, 2009, no. 49(4), pp. 299–300. (In Engl.).
19. Roux A.D., Evenson K.R., Mc Ginn A.P., Brown D.G., Moore L., Brines S., Jacobs D.R. Availability of recreational resources and physical activity in adults. Journal Information, 2007, no. 97(3), pp. 493–499. (In Engl.).
20. Sallis J. F., Bauman A., Pratt M. Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. American journal of preventive medicine, 1998, no. 15(4), pp. 379–397. (In Engl.).
21. Wendel-Vos W., Droomers M., et al. Potential environmental determinants of physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Obesity reviews, 2007, no. 8(5), pp. 425–440. (In Engl.).
1. Baranowski T., Anderson C., Carmack C. Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions: How are we doing? How might we do better? American journal of preventive medicine, 1998, no. 15(4), pp. 266297. (In Engl.).
2. Bertrais S., Preziosi P., et al. Sociodemographic and geographic correlates of meeting current recommendations for physical activity in middle-aged French adults: the Supplementation en Vitamines et Mineraux Antioxydants (SUVIMAX) Study. American Journal of Public Health, 2004, no. 94(9), pp. 1560–1566. (In Engl.).
3. Booth M.L., Bauman A., Owen N., Gore C.J. Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. Preventive medicine, 1997, no. 26(1), pp. 131–137. (In Engl.).
4. Bronfenbrenner U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American psychologist, 1997, no. 32(7), pp. 513–531. (In Engl.).
5. Brownson R.C., Baker E.A., Housemann R.A., Brennan L.K., Bacak S.J. Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. Journal Information, 2001, no. 91 (12), pp. 1995–2003. (In Engl.).
6. De B.I., Sallis J. Relative contribution of psychosocial variables to the explanation of physical activity in three population-based adult samples. Preventive medicine, 2002, no. 34(2), pp. 279–288. (In Engl.).
7. De B.I., Teixeira P.J., Cardon G., Deforche B. Environmental and psychosocial correlates of physical activity in Portuguese and Belgian adults. Public Health Nutrition, 2005, no. 8(7), pp. 886–895. (In Engl.).
8. Dishman R.K., Buckworth J. Increasing physical activity: a quantitative synthesis. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 1996, no. 28(6), pp. 706–719. (In Engl.).
9. Dowda M., Ainsworth B.E., Addy C.L., Saunders R., Riner W. Correlates of physical activity among US young adults, 18 to 30 years of age, from NHANES III. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2003, no. 26(1), pp. 15–23. (In Engl.).
10. Fleury J. and Lee S.M. The social ecological model and physical activity in African American women. American journal of community psychology, 2006, no. 37 (1-2), pp. 129–140. (In Engl.).
11. Grzywacz J.G., Marks N.F. Social inequalities and exercise during adulthood: toward an ecological perspective. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 2001, no. 42(2), pp. 202–220. (In Engl.).
12. Humpel N., Owen N., Leslie E. Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity. American journal of preventive medicine, 2002, no. 22(3), pp. 188–199. (In Engl.).
13. King A.C., Castro C., et al. Personal and environmental factors associated with physical inactivity among different racial–ethnic groups of US middle-aged and older-aged women. Health Psychology, 2000, no. 19(4), pp. 354–364. (In Engl.).
14. Marquez D. X., Mc Auley E. Social cognitive correlates of leisure time physical activity among Latinos. Journal of behavioral medicine, 2006, no. 29(3), pp. 281–289. (In Engl.).
15. Mc Leroy K. R., Bibeau D., Steckler A., Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education & Behavior, 1988, no. 15(4), pp. 351–377. (In Engl.).
16. Mc Millan D.W. and D.M. Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of community psychology, 1986, no. 14(1), pp. 6–23. (In Engl.).
17. Miles L. Physical activity and health. Nutrition Bulletin, 2007, no. 32(4), pp. 314–363. (In Engl.).
18. Morandi L. The role of state policy in promoting physical activity. Preventive medicine, 2009, no. 49(4), pp. 299–300. (In Engl.).
19. Roux A.D., Evenson K.R., Mc Ginn A.P., Brown D.G., Moore L., Brines S., Jacobs D.R. Availability of recreational resources and physical activity in adults. Journal Information, 2007, no. 97(3), pp. 493–499. (In Engl.).
20. Sallis J. F., Bauman A., Pratt M. Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. American journal of preventive medicine, 1998, no. 15(4), pp. 379–397. (In Engl.).
21. Wendel-Vos W., Droomers M., et al. Potential environmental determinants of physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Obesity reviews, 2007, no. 8(5), pp. 425–440. (In Engl.).
Опубликован
17-07-2020
Как цитировать
Yaqun, Z., & Шилько, Т. А. (2020). ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ МОДЕЛИ В ОБЛАСТИ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ ФИЗИЧЕСКОЙ АКТИВНОСТИ. Физическая культура. Спорт. Туризм. Двигательная рекреация, 5(3), 69-73. извлечено от https://fkis74.ru/index.php/fkstdr/article/view/483
Раздел
ТЕОРИЯ И ИСТОРИЯ ФИЗИЧЕСКОЙ КУЛЬТУРЫ, СПОРТА, ТУРИЗМА
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhang Yaqun, Татьяна Александровна Шилько
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование») 4.0 Всемирная.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
